...
Once you are able to modify the boot command line, you can try to use the same boot options which you use in Puppy, which means that you just need to add the prefixes you mention. ...
Unfortunately, this is not what happens. I have tried entering commands on the "command line" you refer to, including the "puppy pfix=..." commands. They have absolutely no effect. Nor do incomplete or nonsense entries on that line, which should result in an error message of some kind, were this a real command line... Whatever I enter on this line, whether after the existing text, or after erasing the existing text, the result when I hit [enter] is always the same - Puppy boots and searches for Puppy files on the system. I have no explanation, I'm just reporting what I see.
In terms of Linux newbies - even functional key handling at the beginning of the boot process is not a good option. Yes, I know how to use functional keys, how to edit boot commands and so on, but the regular user just needs something to see and something which actually works, preferably with no problems. This is another reason why I didn't implement the functional key handling. The regular user just doesn't need that. Advanced users - they should know how to modify the boot command.
Look Ivan, I'm sincerely trying to help popularize Ultilex, because I believe it has merit both from a ultilitarian and a learning viewpoint for many, if not most Puppy users, and potentila Puppy users. But I really believe you seriously misgauge the technical skills of most Puppy users. In my perception, they fall somewhere in between your conception of "regular" and "advanced", and for them the existing Puppy boot command menu is extremely useful, and could well be extended somewhat.
For example, I've been experimenting with Puppy and before that Knoppix, Red Hat, Mandriva, and a numerous other Linux distros for more than a decade, starting with Red Hat 5.0. Of course, in the beginning I had to learn how to do everything from installation on via the command line. But because I didn't use Linux day to day, and because of the many hardware and software problems I encountered (and couldn't really deal with because of lacking support pre-broadband), these skills quickly withered. Since the advent of Knoppix, I have only used the command line in Linux in cases of dire need, and usually with the help of handholding by experienced users.
Yet for the last 18 months, I've used Puppy Linux every day for 99% or more of my web activity. I certainly wouldn't fall into the category of "regular" Puppy user as you describe it, nor am I "advanced"..
I've given you a double thumbs up plug on murga-linux.com,
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/search.php?search_id=egosearch
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=48693and have been using your Ultilex disk instead of my Puppy 4.3.1 disk since
burning the former, despite the clear shortcomings from the point of view of Puppy functionality. This because I am basically interested in exploring TinyCore and Slax. But most regular Puppy users (by my definition) are not quite so keen on straying, and I think this boot limitation will dissuade many who would otherwise use Ultilex from being exposed to the other distributions offered.
In short, if you wish to attract Puppy users to your work, I think you're shooting yourself in the foot by failing to provide, in some similarly convenient form, these boot options that most Puppy users are accustomed to.
PS. you site is loading extremely slowly. I've been waiting more than a minute for a preview, and it took me several tries to get onto the board.
There is no such issue from England, Bulgaria, France, Germany and USA. On the other hand while I was in Malaysia few months ago I also had troubles to access my own site. This is not a hosting issue and unfortunately I can do nothing to speed the things.
I wasn't referring to a constant problem, just one that persisted all day yesterday. In fact, I let the window in which I had "posted' the reply above open for more than 30 minutes, and after that period, it still showed 'waiting for...'. In the end I had to close the window and shut down without knowing whether the post actually went through.
Today, BTW, I've encountered no such issues, nor did I have any similar problems with any other site yesterday while struggling with yours....
You are welcome to review how ULTILEX is designed and what technology I used in order to cretate it. Just read this short tutorial, should you need further technical information on how the boot process is actually handled. In this way you will be able to modify ULTILEX so that it boots Puppy with the exact options that you need.
http://ultilex.linux-bg.org/the_dao_of_ultilex.htmlThanks, I'll read it and give it a try. But I don't see how I can use a "command line" that merely displays text, but doesn't attempt to execute it - which seems to be the situation when I run Ultilex on my PC.